John Carpenter Hints at 'The Thing' Identity, Fan Solves Mystery

The enduring mystery of John Carpenter's iconic 1982 sci-fi horror film, *The Thing*, lies in its deliberately ambiguous ending. For over four decades, fans have debated whether R.J. MacReady, portrayed by Kurt Russell, or Childs, played by Keith David, transforms into the film's titular monster. Carpenter has kept fans guessing, offering no definitive answers—until a recent revelation.

At a special 4K screening of *The Thing* at the David Geffen Theater in Los Angeles on March 22, Carpenter shared with director Bong Joon Ho that there is a "giant hint" hidden within the film that indicates who turns into The Thing at the end. In a playful twist, Carpenter jokingly mentioned he'd reveal this secret to anyone who sends an unspecified amount of money "in an envelope to my house."

Carpenter also disclosed that even the actors were kept in the dark about the true identity of The Thing. "They had no clue," he confessed. "But they had to play it human, you see. The creature imitates perfectly. It could be one of us, it could be somebody in the audience, and there's no way of telling. So I knew, they didn't know."

Following the screening, indie director Joe Russo (not to be confused with the MCU's Joe Russo) took to X / Twitter to share his theory on the hinted clue. Russo pointed out that MacReady learns the creature can replicate at a cellular level, advising that they should only consume items they've personally handled. Yet, at the film's end, MacReady shares his liquor with Childs. This action, Russo argues, suggests MacReady might have forgotten this vital information—or more intriguingly, that he is The Thing. "As soon as Childs drinks from the bottle, The Thing has won," Russo stated. "It's beaten its most skeptical, final threat."

Carpenter's film masterfully ends without confirming Russo's theory, preserving the mystery. However, Russo provided additional evidence, citing the film's final line, "Why don't we just wait here for a little while, see what happens?" as particularly fitting if MacReady is The Thing. Russo's thread also theorizes that the scene where MacReady kills what appears to be The Thing might actually depict "a BETTER imitation kill[ing] a POORER imitation because it had a better chance of infiltrating society upon rescue."

The 25 Best Horror Movies

26 Images

While some fans found Russo's theory compelling, others remained convinced that Childs is the creature, citing his unexplained absence before the final scene. One fan noted, "I still think it’s Childs because we don’t know his whereabouts for a long time heading into the final scene. But Keith David will tell you he’s 100% not The Thing." Russo responded, "Carpenter said both actors don't know... Childs always felt like a red herring to me."

Regardless of where one stands on the theory, Carpenter's ability to keep fans engaged and intrigued after all these years is a testament to his storytelling prowess. We're fortunate to continue receiving insights from this master of horror.